Participating insurance contracts and the Rothschild-Stiglitz equilibrium puzzle
نویسنده
چکیده
We show that an equilibrium always exists in the Rothschild-Stiglitz insurance market model with adverse selection when insurers can o¤er either nonparticipating or participating policies, i.e. insurance contracts which may involve policy dividends or supplementary calls for premium. The equilibrium allocation coincides with the Miyazaki-Spence-Wilson equilibrium allocation, which may involve cross-subsidization between contracts within subgroups of individuals. The paper establishes that participating policies act as an implicit threat that dissuades deviant insurers who aim at attracting low risk individuals only. The model predicts that the mutual corporate form should be prevalent in insurance markets or submarkets where second-best Pareto e¢ ciency requires cross-subsidization between risk types. Stock insurers and mutuals may coexist, with stock insurers o¤ering insurance coverage at actuarial price and mutuals cross-subsidizing risks. It is also shown that deferred premium variations may act as a substitute to policy dividend or supplementary call with similar strategic e¤ects. Ecole Polytechnique, Department of Economics; Email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Optimism and Self-Selection Models: A Theoretical Investigation of the Rothschild-Stiglitz Insurance Model*
This paper analyzes the impact of biased beliefs on the structure of informational equilibria in classical self-selection models. Using the intuitive insurance market example of Rothschild-Stiglitz (1976) I show that biases of high-risk individuals have fundamentally different effects on equilibrium contracts than biases of low-risk individuals. Whereas equilibrium contracts of both groups are ...
متن کاملAn evolutionary analysis of insurance markets with adverse selection
Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) demonstrated that adverse selection may entail nonexistence of equilibrium in competitive insurance markets. We approach this problem in a dynamic model with boundedly rational insurance rms. Firms' behavior is based on imitation of pro t making contracts, withdrawal of loss making contracts, and experimentation with random contracts. Consumers choose in each peri...
متن کاملCompetitive Insurance Markets under Adverse Selection and Capacity Constraints
Ever since the seminal work by Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) on competitive insurance markets under adverse selection the equilibrium-non-existence problem has been one of the major puzzles in insurance economics. We extend the original analysis by considering firms which face capacity constraints, which might be due to limited capital. We show that under mild assumptions a pure strategy equil...
متن کاملDeductible or Co-Insurance: Which is the Better Insurance Contract under Adverse Selection?
The standard solution to adverse selection is the separating equilibrium introduced by Rothschild and Stiglitz. Usually, the Rothschild-Stiglitz argument is developed in a model that allows for two states of the world only. In this paper adverse selection is discussed for continuous loss distributions. This gives rise to the new problem of finding the proper form of an insurance contract to imp...
متن کاملEquilibrium and Strategic Communication in the Adverse Selection Insurance Model
Shows equilibrium always exists (Rothschild-Stiglitz-Wilson model) when firms enforce policy exclusivity via strategic (profit-maximizing) communication of client purchases. Strategic communication induces two equilibrium types: partial communication of purchase information or non-communication which exhibits a lemon effect (low-risk purchase no insurance). Nonetheless, Jaynes' configuration (J...
متن کامل